- Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks software#
- Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks Pc#
- Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks professional#
- Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks free#
In addition to photo editing, I store and stream music (I suppose I could use a NAS for this) and use Garage Band on occasion for some basic audio recording as well as some other music software that isn't terribly resource intensive. How much my processing may increase over time is uncertain. I may want to use iMovie every so often, but it is not a typical use. I use Lightroom and sometimes various plugins and/or Photoshop. I'll take some photos here and there and, of course a lot if I go on vacation or a photo outing on the weekend. Some days, maybe even weeks, I don't process photos at all. I don't process hundreds of photos daily.
Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks Pc#
A top of the line maxed iMac and still running slowly? I know Lightroom is slow but I don't think I have ever heard PC owners with fast machines complaining as I have heard some Mac owners do.Īnyway, quite honestly an i7 and SSD is probably overkill for what I do. Lightroom 1.0 was a definite step backwards in speed, but I really like it otherwise. The imaging software that Adobe originally bought and then relabeled as Lightroom was quite speedy (if I recall correctly). I would go for the SSD over the Fusion drive if you're planning on processing a larger number of images in the future (I process about 300/day), but if you're not, and you're okay with waiting a bit, the Fusion drive should be fine. I have found my iMac (i7 Skylake with 32GB Ram and 512GB SSD) to be somewhat slow with Lightroom - taking about 1.5 to 2 seconds to load/focus each image (24ish MP cropped images from a D810). I guess I will have to find a decent USB hub, because I suspect I am going to need more ports unless I go with Tbolt. I would probably just get the 1 TB SSD, but the premium Apple is charging for it is really pretty ridiculous. As you say, I guess I am going to need external drives in any event, so maybe one additional drive isn't a big deal. But I just don't see any reason besides saving a few bucks for putting a spinner in an iMac. I prefer SSD over Fusion, since I've had several HDDs fail in iMacs, and they are increasingly difficult to service. Many of us use say 512GB SSDs and store photos on a variety of external devices from Tbolt RAIDs to external USB3 drives to NAS.
And you must have external storage, if only for backup. Whether you can use a smaller one depends on what you need to store on the internal SSD, and what external storage you'll be using. You can't go wrong with the biggest SSD Apple will sell you. I do have an external drive attached, but that is being used for a Time Machine backup rather than for additional storage space. Yes, at the moment, 2TB is sufficient for my storage needs, but that, of course may change over time. If you can store everything you need on a 2 tb internal that might be satisfactory.Īs my storage requirements run higher I prefer large external Thunderbolt enclosures, but that may not be an issue for you. I gather from your post that you have no external drives, so that may be the deciding factor for you. I have yet to read about a fusion user who was disappointed. I rather like my SSD, having used it to replaced a factory internal HDD.
Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks professional#
What would the practical difference be between an SSD and 2TB Fusion drive in terms of performance, keeping in mind I am not a professional or power user? What is the consensus regarding the difference between an SSD and fusion drive? Specifically I am considering a 512GB SSD, but as mentioned in one of my prior threads, I have always had much more internal storage space.
Imac fusion drive vs ssd benchmarks free#
(Feel free to comment to the contrary if you don't agree with either of these). Similarly I have seen suggestions that it really isn't necessary to go for the 395x video card if only doing some basic video editing. Having said that, I edit very large files with an i5 and have no complaints. In general, it seems to me that the price of a new computer is spread over a sufficient number of years that it makes sense to purchase the very highest spec machine that you can afford. From prior threads it seems that the majority seem to suggest an i7 over an i5 for photo editing with Lightroom notwithstanding the price difference.
0 kommentar(er)
